Thursday 31 December 2009

POTD 31/12 2009



Not a very artistic photo, but then I don't have a screen that'll do well for editing anyway. Just wanted to show off that my new tripod allows me to take pictures of itself. The carrying bag is behind it, and the little case is a strap-on case with spiked feet. This is much better than the Manfrotto equivalent.

Saturday 12 December 2009

White balance example

One of the first things you learn when you start doing digital photography is what white balance is. Tungsten light has a very different color from flourescent light, which is again very different from sunlight, which in itself varies according to the position of the sun. But an example today struck home just how much a fairly small difference in white balance can do.


When I first saw this scarf done, I commented on how it almost looked like camouflage colours. After the buttons were added, I do a simple shoot of it in (purple) living room, working with sunlight but shooting with flash as I didn't want a multi-second exposure. The light was great and I really liked the way the shape was brought out, too, so I uploaded it as my POTD for today:



Only when I came back to it shortly after did it occur to me that it looked a lot more purple than I remembered it. Back to Lightroom, and sure enough, I hadn't specified the white balance. It was set to 5750/+41 by the camera (probably due to all the green in the yarn) rather than the 5500/+0 that is the "flash" setting. Simply adjusting to the "flash" setting cured all the camera-automatics-imposed ills and gave the picture above. Here's what the difference looks like in Lightroom:



Here's the final version, where the camouflage color way can clearly be seen:



Lesson: Just because the light is controlled doesn't mean the camera will get it right. Not even when the camera knows there's a flash on. Never trust camera automatic white balance. Ever. For anything where money is involved, definitely bring the grey card.

POTD 12/12 2009



"Scarf"

Could possibly have used a bit of bounce on the far side.

Sunday 6 December 2009

Flash and batteries

Last year I got a cheap store-brand flash. It's been serving me fairly well, but I had two problems with it: First, it could not rotate left-right, only up-down, second, it takes AA batteries rather than a high-quality LiIon battery. On the second part, my subjective impression was that the flash recharged a lot faster with alkaline batteries than with rechargables. My flash recharge was really slow with rechargables, much better with alkalines. However, this test very clearly shows something else. I'm wondering now if I just had really crappy/old rechargables, and will have to try new ones. However, it appears I'll have to deal with AAs no matter what flash I use, that's what they all take. In which case, I'll live with the lack of left-right rotate for a while longer.