First, buy some cheap crap

There's a classic style of post about just about any kind of photographic equipment that shows how starting with cheap equipment and gradually going to better and better gear is much more expensive than getting the better gear to begin with. These posts always irk me, especially when accompanied by exhortations to get the finest, most expensive gear that's out of the range of most mortals.

My approach has been exactly the opposite: When going into a new area when I don't know what to look for, I get something cheap that I expect to get rid of in a year or two. Whether tripods or flashes or
studio lights, I look for a third-party or store-brand kit as a "learner set". I'll then use that plus various internet sites to learn how to use that thing and what it is I like and don't like about it. I have found this to work a lot better than trying to understand what's useful and what's a gimmick based on internet reviews.

Once you've figured out the basics of this new type of equipment, it's time to get a reasonable one. This is where the mass-market brand-name items come into play. You can now reasonably look at reviews and comparisons, disregarding things you've found are unimportant for you, and up-rating what's really your thing. I bought my 60D this way: I made a spreadsheet of the features I wanted and the cameras that gave them. Since some features, like a flip-out display, are relatively rare, it cut down the selection to where I could borrow or rent the options until I knew what to get. I didn't do it when getting a tripod, but was lucky enough to be able to sell the Manfrotto that didn't suit me for a small loss.

The medium-quality item is likely to last you for several years, during which you'll figure out if it was just a short infatuation with a particular method or technology or something you want to specialize in. If the latter, you will surely learn enough by then to get what you need, rather than what people are trying to push.

If you tried getting the very best quality from the beginning, you're as likely as not to get something that's not suited to your needs: Too big, too heavy, too specialized. And even if you get a thing that suits you, you might find that it was just a passing fancy that you spent thousands of euros on instead of hundreds.

The main point is to make a conscious decision to get a "learner set". Know that it will be sub-par and adjust your expectations accordingly. Then you'll have a better chance at getting what you really need later.

A final note: Don't apply this to items where your safety is at stake.

POTD 31/3/2013: De-feet-ed

"De-feet-ed", ©2013 Lars Clausen

This is my entry into the current photo challenge between me and +aurin ræder. The challenge is "Feet, using extreme tele/crop". This is a detail of the Mariensaüle at Marienplatz, and while it looks dramatic, the owner of the victorious foot is actually a chubby little cherub, one of four defeating various monsters. I like it for the dramatic composition and the mixture of two very different feet.

POTD 23/3 2013: Rust Plants

"Rust Plants" ©2013 Lars Clausen
Buy this photo at RedBubble.com

I'm with +Mickey Blake  in Wales this weekend. While she's learning new and exciting knitting things (such as that she's been knitting her purls twisted since the very beginning), I'm going around with my camera, trying to get the best out of a cloudy early spring in the Welsh countryside.

Today I went over to Pembroke and from there out to the ocean at Freshwater West, which is a quite impressive sight (more pictures from that trip can be seen at http://goo.gl/JgDRq). On the way to the ocean, I stopped off in a little forest, and while the forest itself wasn't that interesting, there were a series of two meter high rusted metal structures that were quite interesting for a macro photographer. I could have spent hours there exploring the rust and paint flakes and plants and how they all came together in strange ways, but I wanted to get out to the water before it got dark.

This photo was the best of the trip, I love the rusted surface as the little mosses growing into the tube. My macro lens still seems to front-focus a bit, which is why the right side isn't quite in focus. I should compare the normal focus with the (very slow and light-sensitive) live-view focus. Unfortunately, the 60D does not have a focus microadjustment feature, maybe Magic Lantern will add that (if it can).

POTD 20/3 2013: Dice Tower

"Tower of Dice" ©2008 Lars Clausen
Buy this photo at RedBubble.com

I doubt any long-time RPG gamer hasn't at some point stacked their dice like this, only to have a fellow player "accidentally" bump the table just enough to make it topple.

This is the other picture that got sold as a wedding present. I like how clean this turned out, and how the transparency plays out. The shots were taken when I had built an impromptu lightbox and was trying with everyday lights to make effective shots, trying for some subjects that hadn't already been done a million times before. Though now later I have to admit that doing subjects that have been done before isn't such a bad thing. You can learn from how others have done them, you can compare yours to theirs, and you can get some experience in all those things that are common to almost all subjects, like lighting, background, composition, lighting, shadows, lighting, color management, lighting, lighting and more lighting.

POTD 19/3 2013: Barbed Morning Glory Wire

"Barbed Morning Glory Wire" ©2008 Lars Clausen
Buy this photo at RedBubble.com

This photo could be taken just about anywhere, but it's from Royal Oak, the suburb of Detroit my wife's aunt lives in ("I'm so bad, I vacation in Detroit!"). Being from a very peaceful country, I'm not used to seeing barbed wire around normal neighborhoods, so this juxtaposition really struck me. I have a thing for morning glory, since we brought some back from our time in Iran and have been growing them ever since.

This was taken with the 70-300 f/4.0-5.6 IS, which was a good lens for its price, but larger and heavier than I wanted it, especially since most of the size and weight was wasted on my crop camera. So I have since swapped it out for the 55-250, which works nicely as a walk-around lens. It's hard to tell on this small version, but the flower is not entirely sharp. The background separation is excellent, though.

POTD 17/3 2013: Dot dot dot...

"Dot dot dot..." © Lars Clausen 2007
Buy this photo at RedBubble.com

A more whimsical shot today, from a morning walk in a cold November. The way the gulls spread out evenly from the fall-colored tree struck me as curious, accentuated by the reflections. I deliberately darkened the background in Lightroom, as it was only distracting from the main subject. The gulls are unfortunately somewhat overexposed on the bright parts, I should have gone for "expose-to-the-right", which in this case would mean underexposing a bit. Which in turn would have made the background disappear more.

POTD 16/3 2013

"Heavenly Bubble" ©2006 Lars Clausen
Buy this photo at RedBubble.com 

This is my entry for the first photo challenge between me and +aurin ræder: "Soft Water, High Key". It was taken at night on the Mountain View Google campus with an 8 second exposure. The "bubble" is actually water flowing up from the tube visible underneath it. This is one of the few of my shots from that night that didn't come out rather shaken, however several of the other ones are abstract enough that it doesn't matter.

I like this for the soft tones of blue, the faint hint of texture in most of it, and the little streaks of white on and around the bubble. It would make for an excellent screen background, too.